|
Post by porkvindaloo on Aug 31, 2008 13:51:29 GMT 10
I agree strongly with anyone who is criticizing the VIT. They do absolutely nothing of any good for anyone at all. All they do is take our money, cause annoyance, make life difficult and generally piss us off. I've just had to do my five year renewal and it made me very angry. FUCK THE VIT. If this gets any worse we'll have to do something about it
|
|
|
Post by alimcg on Sept 1, 2008 9:49:56 GMT 10
It underlines the inherent problems associated with these type of bodies. They're entrusted with what is essentially a niche area, an area that requires specific knowledge and training to teach, but they have no understanding or appreciation of student or teacher needs in such a niche (pronounced "nitch").
A body that is geared towards general teaching is never going to provide the support or understanding needed by music educators, and will struggle to comprehend that the person they see as "unqualified" will often be the most qualified person for the job. This also strikes at the heart of ensemble direction in schools, not just instrumental teaching.
|
|
|
Post by ironguts on Sept 1, 2008 12:58:29 GMT 10
thats perty well writ for a dumber! its amazing considering you carnt even play a specific piche!
|
|
|
Post by alimcg on Sept 1, 2008 13:19:36 GMT 10
me mum dun help me rite that won
|
|
|
Post by captain on Sept 1, 2008 15:45:26 GMT 10
Isn't 'Bap', a pitch?
|
|
|
Post by shaggaz on Sept 1, 2008 15:46:35 GMT 10
Thanks to everyone for their replies!
I'd just like to add that if the VIT were to invent some kind of fair assessment system for teachers without education qualifications (hey, I can dream), I would gladly take part. I am not a trained teacher, I learnt on the job and am very grateful to the schools who originally took me on and to the staff who coached and mentored me. I am happy to have my skills assessed.
Thanks Joffa, I may well take our case to the VTU, but I'm not a member, so may have to rectify that situation first.
|
|
|
Post by timothystevens on Sept 1, 2008 16:10:47 GMT 10
You're right – in and of itself the idea of a regulatory body is probably not a bad thing. But when the regulations stink they way they do at the VIT, the whole thing would be better dismantled and sold for scrap.
|
|
|
Post by ironguts on Sept 1, 2008 17:47:45 GMT 10
Wow, dont' mean to be pikkie, but Tim made a boo boo, even though whet he sayed was bloody beauty.
|
|
|
Post by timothystevens on Sept 1, 2008 19:01:54 GMT 10
Hara-kiri to follow.
|
|
|
Post by alimcg on Sept 6, 2008 10:52:47 GMT 10
Of course this is also the organization that forgot to bill me for 2 years. Even though they had my correct address, one piece of mail was returned to them. This resulted not in them calling or emailing me to check my address, but in them striking me from the database. I believe this accurately encapulates their incompetence and irrelevance.
|
|
|
Post by alimcg on Nov 11, 2008 11:04:16 GMT 10
There has been some talk that the VIT regulations will be changed at some point in the not-too-distant future, so that only teachers with a teaching degree would be able to teach instrumental music in schools (or state schools at least). Yesterday The Age's education lift-out had a spread on music in schools, not overly informative for someone on the inside, but maybe worthy reading for parents/students. I did however come across this statistic - 13% of music teachers have a teaching degree and 20% have no qualification at all.
I would assume then that 67% of music teachers have a BMus, music diploma, or similar. If the regulations do change, where on earth are they going to find enough suitably qualified teachers to replace the 87% with no teaching qualification?
Also, should we be concerned about the 20% completely lacking in formal qualifications? (Not every person lacking formal qualifications will be as well qualified as ironguts...)
NB. It's possible that I've misinterpreted the stats, or that the article omitted an important detail regarding those figures - I'm just going on what I read. I'd put a link, but it doesn't appear to be on their website yet.
|
|
|
Post by punter on Nov 11, 2008 15:35:44 GMT 10
Is this only secondary teachers? It's so ridiculous, the real scandal is the outsourcing of music teaching in primary schools... what goes on with some of these shonky organisations is an absolute disaster but it has somehow escaped attention. Not saying all of these organisations are bad but when they are there are virtually no regulations. Take Musicorp for example... or Andrew Best's 'operation'...
|
|
|
Post by alimcg on Nov 11, 2008 16:06:09 GMT 10
The article didn't specify secondary or primary, and it did cover a bit of both.
I don't know much about the primary school side of things. I think some primary schools suffer further as there is often no musical experience among the staff, no music specialist, so when things get out-sourced nobody knows enough to know when things aren't quite right.
|
|
|
Post by punter on Nov 12, 2008 17:09:05 GMT 10
Yes you're exactly right and the VIT does nothing about it... instead they just get in the way of secondary instrumental teachers who are doing a fine job. Bloody parasites!
|
|
|
Post by vickibonet on Nov 12, 2008 22:20:24 GMT 10
|
|